Claim:

Animals were harmed and/or killed in the making of the 1986 Japanese film, “The Adventures of Milo and Otis.”

Rating:

Beloved to ’90s kids everywhere, “The Adventures of Milo and Otis” is a 1986 Japanese film about a pug (Otis) as he follows an orange tabby cat (Milo) through a series of perilous obstacles. It was a massive hit, rising to Japan’s number one film of 1986.

As one of the first and only films to use an entirely live cast of animals (no animation or CGI involved in production), it is loved for its adorable characters, whose clumsy blunders and narrow escapes from danger the English actor Dudley Moore narrates (Shigeru Tsuyuki in the Japanese version).

The unlikely friends evade attacks from multiple animals, including real bears, with one scene even depicting Milo “jumping” off a cliff to escape an attacking flock of seagulls. In an article from 2012 [archived here], PETA Australia wrote that “movies such as Milo and Otis ― for which, in order to get the right shot of a cat falling off a cliff, filmmakers simply threw the cat over the edge ― are seen as a thing of the past.” Another scene shows a crab attacking a small cat, and many on the internet have alleged that a cat’s paw was intentionally broken to make it look like it was walking unsteadily.

Over the years, viewers and animal-rights groups have raised questions about the safety of the animals involved in production, including claims that over 20 cats were killed and multiple dogs were mauled by a bear or drowned.

TIL during the filming of The Adventures of Milo & Otis many animal cruelty allegations were made against the film including the alleged killing of over 20 kittens, the director breaking a cat’s paw, and a cat plunging over 100 feet off a cliff.
byu/meinthrowawayaccount intodayilearned

I just learned about what happened in Milo and Otis
by inmovies

While many on the internet claimed that there was no solid evidence of abuse or the killing of animals in production, others pointed to the movie itself as evidence. “Watch the movie and use your judgement,” one Reddit user wrote. Ask yourself how did they get this shot, did they put actually have to put the animal in danger and the answer is yes.”

Following the film’s 1986 release in Japan (and the 1989 release in the U.S. with 15 minutes worth of scenes deleted), two articles in particular are referenced as the source of abuse allegations. The first is an article in The Sunday Mail by P. Gillespie from 1990, and the other, also from 1990, published in Hobart Mercury by Brandt Teale. According to Dream Fiction Wiki [archived here]:

Although multiple sites aside from Dream Fiction Wiki, including the Wikipedia page for “The Adventures of Milo and Otis” [archived here] and Stack Exchange [archived here], cite these articles, we were unable to independently find these articles on the internet, archived or otherwise. This does not mean those articles never existed. We primarily searched on newspapers.com, an archival newspaper database.

Several clips of archived papers can be found in which concerned readers also alleged abuse, with two examples below from 1990:

“By radically downplaying the feral side of nature, ‘Milo and Otis’ offers a vision of the natural world that is awesome and occasionally fearful, but never terrifying,” a 1989 New York Times review of the film read. “The nature photography has an almost hallucinatory beauty, and the extraordinary closeup photography of Milo and Otis, who were portrayed by an assortment of lookalike dogs and cats during the four years it took to complete the film, has an almost soulful quality.”

The American Humane Association (AHA) published a report (archived link here from 2000), which found that:

The AHA report also noted that various Japanese humane societies allowed their names to be used in connection with the movie:

While most of the above organizations did not have email contacts listed publicly or message portals, we did reach out to Animal Welfare Japan, Animal Rights Center Japan, Japan Rescue Association, Humane Society International, and Japan Veterinary Medical Association seeking information regarding this claim. We will update this story if we receive a response.

We also sought comment via email from Sony Corporation, which acquired Columbia Pictures Entertainment (the distributer of “The Adventures of Milo and Otis”) in 1989, the same year the film was released in the U.S. According to one blog post from 2006, “Columbia took great pains not to say ‘no animals were harmed,’ which has been boilerplate language on movie animal disclaimers for as long as anyone can remember.”

Masanori Hata, the film’s director alongside associate director Kon Ichikawa, is hailed today as someone who made “connecting humans with animals his life’s purpose,” whose “eyes shone with wisdom and kindness.” On April 5, 2023, he died from a heart attack. He never publicly commented on the abuse allegations.

A little more than a decade prior to the release of “The Adventures of Milo and Otis,” Japan passed the Act on Welfare and Management of Animals 1973. According to the act, killing or injuring an animal [included on the list of protected animals] is punishable with fines or imprisonment of up to two years. Even with this legislation in place, Japan’s animal rights protections continue to rank low by international standards.

In sum, we were unable to independently verify whether these rumors had merit, as of this writing. As such, we have rated the claim “Unproven.” If new information becomes available to us, we will update this story accordingly.

Sources